REVIEW: Johnny English Reborn

October 17th, 2011 by Matthew Fong

Rowan Atkinson returns to the big screen in Johnny English Reborn, the sequel to the British spy comedy Johnny English which came out 8 years earlier in 2003. You don’t really need a review of this movie…it’s more of the same and exactly what you expect. If you enjoy these type of slapstick, corny and simple comedies, you’ll have a blast. It’s great for kids and kids who haven’t yet grown up. This sequel pretty much has the same formula as the original. I’m a Mr. Bean fan so I enjoy almost everything that Rowan Atkinson does…this is no different, I was laughing throughout the entire movie.


Reborn starts with Johnny English training with monks in Tibet since he’s been dismissed from MI7 after his botched mission in Mozambique. However, he’s been called back to duty to a changed secret service (MI7 is now referred to the Toshiba British Intelligence). I didn’t quite get that joke and a few others as there are many inside British jokes. What is universal, though, is Atkinson’s comedy through incredible control of his body, mannerisms and especially eyes and eyebrows. Every time someone says Mozambique, all the kids watching the movie will laugh.

Johnny English Reborn

He's still got it!


The movie goes through the typical spy spoof scenes with crazy tech gadgets from the toy cupboard, hot chick distractions and nick-of-time action. It makes fun of the genre all while playing out its own spy plot: “Spying …For You!” With every scene, if you didn’t think the story could get more ridiculous, you were proved wrong. The movies are obviously targeted for kids, but the older audience will have a great time too…especially if you grew up watching Rowan Atkinson. You could say that he is passed his prime and wasting his talents, but it looked like he was having a fun time while filming this movie. I certainly had a fun time watching it.
Johnny English Reborn

I could not stop laughing during this scene


You’ll probably forget this movie as fast as you forgot the first one (do you even remember the plot of the first one?), but for the 100 or so minutes of watching this, you’re guaranteed a few laughs. The movie doesn’t stick too long with any one gag and keeps the story moving along so the little ones don’t get bored. It’s chocked full of laughs from various types of comedy so even if you don’t like stupid word play or the physical comedy or the over the top antics, you’re bound to find something to laugh at. And if you like sticking around the theater, there’s a little more during the ending credits.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Tags: , , ,

Matthew Fong created advancescreenings.com and is the lead contributor. He watches every type of movie and will try almost anything twice. You can follow him on twitter here: @matthewfong
  • Salomeslastdance

    Exactly why is this film “obviously” targeted for kids and in what why is the film “simple”? Is it because the film is working within the genres of farce and slapstick? (Are Blake Edwards’ Pink Panther films simple and for kids?) Your review reads like a series of assertions of taste, with no understanding of the genres

  • Salomeslastdance

    You also say nothing in regard the filmmaking, which seems to be working in a more within  the classical style than intensified continuity. I suggest that you do not project your response to a film –ie: “You’ll probably forget this movie as fast as you forgot the first one (do you even remember the plot of the first one?)”– onto the reader.

  • Salomeslastdance

    And I should double check my responses before I post them.

    So here are the corrections and apologies for all the posts:

    Exactly why is this film “obviously” targeted for kids and in what way
    is the film “simple”? Is it because the film is working within the
    genres of farce and slapstick? (Are Blake Edwards’ Pink Panther films
    simple and for kids?) Your review reads like a series of assertions of
    taste, with no understanding of the genres.

     You also say nothing in regard to the filmmaking, which seems to be working  more within the classical style than intensified continuity. I
    suggest that you do not project your response to a film –ie: “You’ll
    probably forget this movie as fast as you forgot the first one (do you
    even remember the plot of the first one?)”– onto the reader.