Posts Tagged ‘Gemma Arterton’

REVIEW: Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

When I saw footage for this movie at WonderCon a few months back, I wasn’t impressed so I skipped the advance screening and saw the film, “The Kids Are Alright” instead (review of The Kids Are Alright will be posted in a couple weeks with some Q&A from the writer/director). I heard a lot of bad things about Prince of Persia (it only has 39% on Rotten Tomatoes at the time of me writing this review and I’m sure it will go down) so I knew I made the right decision. Either way, I did end up watching it and in the beginning, I was really surprised – I liked it. However, as the movie continued, I saw what everyone was talking about.


Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is about a prince with no royal blood but a noble character which the King saw one day when adopting him as a boy off the streets of his kingdom. Tricked and betrayed, the prince, named Dastan and played by Jake Gyllenhaal, is turned into a wanted criminal in his own home. He flees with a princess named Tamina (Gemma Arterton) and discovers the power of a mysterious dagger which (if you couldn’t tell by the title of the movie or foreshadows in the opening scenes) can manipulate and turn back time. It’s inspired by a video game of the same name.

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Jake Gyllenhaal (Prince Dastan) and Gemma Arterton (Princess Tamina)


It’s a time piece based in the time of Persia yet none of the actors looks Persian. It’s all sword fights, flying daggers, and brute strength. The fight scenes were pretty well done and there are definitely some cool parts especially with what they did with the snakes. The time effects are very visually appealing and depict what’s happening without words…when it comes to time travel and quirky chain of events, that’s sometimes hard to do and I feel that this movie did a good job on that. But don’t expect this movie to win an Oscar for set or costume design…they did have sand though, so that stayed true to the times I guess.


It’s supposed to be an action flick, period. And that part was good, but once it started trying to be something more, like a mythological drama alongside a love story between two great civilizations, the movie goes off track. As I said, I was surprised by the opening action scenes…it was entertaining and gripping. Even though a lot of it looked fake, the way it was filmed kept the flow moving fast and exciting. The action kept going for about an hour until the story started getting in the way. We’re introduced to the princess who introduces us to the legend of the dagger and the blah blah blah, I didn’t care for any of it.


Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
The movie turned into your typical lost in the desert, find foes who turn into friends, figure out the mystery, and set things right movie like all The Mummys and other action adventure flicks. It’s a formula that writers keep using but I hope they would stop. Honestly, I got lost in the crap of the middle and end and just wanted it to end so I could get on with my life. If I controlled the dagger of time, I would go back to about an hour into the movie after one of the major action scenes and walk out of the theater.

REVIEW: Clash of the Titans

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Clash of the TitansHere’s the gist of it: Clash of the Titans follows a demigod (half man/half god) named Perseusas as he fulfils his fate to bring in the new era of man and replace the rule of the Gods. Man was created by Zeus and man’s prayers fuel the God’s immortality. However, Man started to grow tired of the Gods and started to turn on them. Hades, Zeus’s bitter brother, decides to use this opportunity to overthrow his brother and take power over both Gods and Man through his pet monster called the Kraken. Long story short (the movie is 2 hours long), this is yet another one guy goes on a journey, meets people along the way, finds himself, and saves the world movie. The visuals are pretty poor, the acting is blah, and the music is mundane. It definitely should not be in 3D, but more on that later…


I’m going to try and steer you away from this movie and give you some alternatives. Percy Jackson and the Olympians (review) which is actually a pretty similar story line and shares some of the same Greek myths and themes, has better imagery (you can put almost identical scenes side by side) and is honestly more entertaining. But, Percy Jackson was made for kids so if you want better action (and a lot more gore), wait for Centurion (review) which is in a similar era (not mythology, but still swords and arrows). It comes out in the UK next month, but I got to see a screening at the South by Southwest Film Festival and you can check out my review here.


When it comes to new things, a lot of the time after you take 2 steps forward (Avatar, How to Train Your Dragon (review)), you take 1 step back. Clash of the Titans was one huge step back…in more than one way. The biggest issue everyone will have with this movie is the unwarranted 3D. This movie was made in 2D but then the studio decided they wanted to squeeze a few more bucks out of it so they delayed the movie and made it 3D in post production. What does that mean? It means that instead of using the new 3D cameras that were made for and used in movies such as Avatar, they filmed the movie with regular cameras and added 3D elements after. As a result, the 3D was pitiful and in some ways distracting. If you can, watch this movie in 2D or just take off the 3D glasses, trust me, you’ll enjoy the movie more. To be honest, some of the scenes surprised me with how they could transform 2D into some cool 3D, but most of the time with most of the scenes, it was crap.


So, that’s one step back. This movie also took another step back for Greek mythology. They used the same old worn out stories and didn’t go in depth on anything in particular. I know this was a remake but there were only small glimpses of reimagination when there was so much potential to retell the golden tales of past and expose an audience to some new gems. As the movie stated when it began, the oldest stories are told in the stars…these are some of the greatest oldest stories; they could’ve tried to breathe new life into them. Instead, you got a blockbuster movie aimed to squeeze that first weekend box office for all its worth and then fall to the Kraken of public opinion.