Posts Tagged ‘Rashida Jones’

REVIEW: Finding Joe

Friday, October 14th, 2011

Finding JoeEvery now and then there’s an inspirational movie that makes you get off your butt and want to do something great. Sadly, Finding Joe is not that movie. Ever since I saw the trailer for Finding Joe, I knew I had to see it – I love movies that open the mind and have you thinking a different way. Littered with interviews and conversations from numerous notable figures, Finding Joe looked like it had some new insight into what pushes a person to live the life they want rather than the life they settle for. The Joe is a double entendre for both every average Joe and Joseph Campbell, the mythologist who coined the “hero’s journey.”


Finding Joe is all about the hero’s journey. I have to watch it again and count how many times they actually repeat it. The structure of the documentary is set around the journey and the subject matter of most of the interviews is the journey. What is the hero’s journey? It’s the basis of pretty much every single story in our history. Spanning all cultures, languages and religions, the hero’s journey goes through the steps of a complete compelling story of a changed man. It goes through the challenges, fears, dragons, battles and return home to tell your story and set someone else off on their very own journey.

Finding Joe

YEAH!


With interviews from the likes of Deepak Chopra, Sir Ken Robinson, Alan Cohen and Brian Johnson, we’re giving a front row seat to a motivational speech that people pay a lot more than a movie ticket to see. The filmmaker also interviews people like Tony Hawk, Mick Fleetwood, Rashida Jones and Laird Hamilton to get more well known names and have mass appeal. He even threw in Catherine Hardwicke for some reason (the director of Twilight). There are some nuggets of great philosophy but for the most part, it is extremely redundant and contains very blunt rudimentary ideas that would be taught to children. Nothing awe inspiring really comes out of this documentary which I was very disappointed to realize.
Finding Joe

...yeah


Sliced between quotes from Joseph Campbell, Finding Joe has interview after interview intertwined with random shots of random people and a group of kids acting out different scenes from the hero’s journey as the interviewees are voiced over them. The scenes with the kids looked more like a high school project which was shot over a weekend. The music in the back kept making it seem like every scene was the ending scene of a movie where they sum up everything and leave you with closing remarks. If you watch the trailer, the movie is like watching that on repeat for 80 minutes.
Finding Joe

I wonder why they didn't have any press photos of the interviewees =/


I was really looking forward to this movie but was let down. There are many other pieces of work that talk about Joseph Campbell and his ideas including the hero’s journey. There are also many other works which describe how influential the idea is and how it is found in common day stories everywhere. Finding Joe does begin with cuts of scenes from a plethora of popular movies to illustrate how the hero’s journey is in basically every single film but again, I think they did that to pull in the average Joe and have them relate to something they know. I would have preferred to hear the words of the M.D.s and Ph.D.s who have studied these philosophical works and have true insight into what makes a person tick and what really allows someone to “follow their bliss.” Instead, Finding Joe just reiterates what you should already know.

REVIEW: Our Idiot Brother

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Our Idiot BrotherYou know what, you know what? Wow. Our Idiot Brother is a special movie. From the very beginning, Paul Rudd just makes you want to smile :) . He plays that lovable sweet hippie that’s always in a good mood and has an endless supply of unconditional love to give to the world. This movie is as magical as that character and it’ll win you over even if you don’t understand why. Starring a ridiculously extensive cast, Our Idiot Brother is being released this weekend after premiering at Sundance (as My Idiot Brother) earlier in the year. It’s a part of that weird breed of mainstream indie films that have been growing recently.


The first thing to note are the people in the movie. I’m surprised they’re pushing Rudd as a single headliner when there are so many great names attached. Rudd does do an amazing job and the plot does surround him, but the acting from all of the supporting characters is what puts this movie over the top. You have Elizabeth Banks, Zooey Deschanel, Emily Mortimer, Rashida Jones, Adam Scott, Steve Coogan, Shirley Knight and then T.J. Miller and Kathryn Hahn! The movie begins with quick cuts to introduce all the characters and through the movie, you become intertwined in all of their relationships and problems. Paul Rudd is Ned, the idiot brother to three gorgeous sisters: Miranda (Elizabeth Banks), Natalie (Zooey Deschanel) and Liz (Emily Mortimer).

Our Idiot Brother

Ned (Paul Rudd) and his sisters Miranda (Elizabeth Banks), Natalie (Zooey Deschanel) and Liz (Emily Mortimer)


Ned just wants the simple life. He doesn’t know if he’s coming or going, he just knows that he’s there. He’s a happy-go-lucky, dog-loving, environmental dude who doesn’t have much going on upstairs. “I feel like such an idiot.” He also doesn’t have a filter and makes quite a few mishaps. In his misfortune, he’s juggled around by his family – first living with his mom (Shirley Knight) and then his various sisters. From housewife/mother Liz to Vanity Fair-writer Miranda to bi-sexual lesbian Natalie, each have their distinct personalities and deal with Ned in their own ways…just like a real family.
Our Idiot Brother

if you look like this, you'll love this movie, man


However, this family is everything but ordinary. All of the laughs come from the quirkiness of all the characters and the scenarios they put each other through. There’s nothing unbelievable or overextended, just each character is a hyperbole of their varied traits. The story is pretty straightforward as they all get their lives turned upside down as Ned passes through. There’s nothing astounding going on, it’s just a cute story about an idiot sibling who unknowingly messes everything up. It’s charming, simple and feel-good fun. It’s a great movie just to watch for the enjoyment of watching a movie and not as a spectacle.
Our Idiot Brother

Paul Rudd will just make you want to smile :)


While the film had a lot of great things going on, it felt like something was missing to connect a few of the scenes. I really wanted to fall in love with the film but I ended up just liking it. If the script had one more draft or the directing was just a bit tighter, the movie could of been more cohesive but in the end, it was a great concept executed just well enough to make it on screens. I was surprised my audience laughed as much as it did because I felt like the movie spoke to me individually but chalk that up to a great story that has tidbits of obscurity masked in mass appeal. I guess that’s the definition of these “mainstream indies.” But really, Our Idiot Brother will just make you smile, man. Guaranteed. “…loved Major Lazer!”

REVIEW: Friends With Benefits

Thursday, June 9th, 2011

Deja Vu. Everyone will automatically compare Friends With Benefits with the movie released earlier this year with the same exact concept called No Strings Attached so let’s start there and get the elephant out of the room. While No Strings Attached was almost all about the sex, Friends With Benefits is more about the relationship. That may sound more boring to some people, but it’s actually more “real” and genuinely funnier. They are both completely manufactured romantic comedies aimed to the female demographic but Friends With Benefits is more in line with what people really go through and audiences will be able to relate to it more. Instead of Ashton Kutcher, you have Justin Timberlake and instead of Natalie Portman, you have her Black Swan co-star Mila Kunis. Everybody just wants to have sex, buddy.


Friends With Benefits is about a guy and a girl who want to have sex without the relationship. Justin Timberlake is Dylan who’s called “emotionally unavailable” by his latest girlfriend played by Emma Stone. Mila Kunis is Jamie who is deemed “emotionally damaged” by her ex played by Andy Samberg. Jamie’s a headhunter who lures Dylan out to New York from Los Angeles to take a job at GQ magazine. As soon as they meet in the airport, Jamie is goofy yet cute and Dylan is digging every moment of it…you can tell sparks are going to fly. Since Dylan is new to the city and has no friends, he starts hanging out with Jamie a lot and they eventually get to talking about S-E-X. Why can’t two people just have sex like any other physical activity? Like Tennis? They seal the deal over an iPad Bible app and you guessed it, it doesn’t quite work out the way they thought and of course there are complications.

Friends With Benefits

Some of the best ideas come from the couch when you're drunk...or are those the worst ideas?


The tone of the movie is very quirky as it tries to stick you in the middle of these two characters with very strong personalities. You start learning the idiosyncrasies of each of them like Dylan’s terrible math skills, instant defense that Harry Potter doesn’t make you gay and sexually timed sneezing. Jamie, on the other hand, has hopeless fairy tale dreams and cursed blinking. I loved Mila Kunis’ character: she’s quick on her feet and goes after what she wants no matter what…girl power to the max. The chemistry between Kunis and Timberlake was almost nonexistent as if they were in two separate movies.
Friends With Benefits

Mila Kunis could probably kick Justin Timberlake's ass...and he'd enjoy it


In fact, the script felt like it was from two different movies as well. I bet multiple writers worked on it because there were a lot of hilarious quotables and natural dialogue but then they spliced in blatantly obvious lines like, “look at my mother, of course I am the way I am.” The audience isn’t dumb…they could figure that one out. I hate when movies try to poke fun at their own genre in an attempt to be above the stereotypes and cliches. Dylan and Jamie keep watching (and making fun of) a DVD of a ridiculously cheesy fake romantic comedy starring Jason Segel and Rashida Jones yet the movie goes through the same cliches itself! JT adds his own soundtrack to the movie which is kind of funny but not what you expect.
Friends With Benefits

yeah, and this was done in Going The Distance...another romcom from the past year


My major complaint about the movie: not enough naked Mila Kunis! There is plenty of lingerie Mila though :) . There’s no full frontal nudity in FWB but there is plenty of backside from both Kunis and JT. Hooray for equality. The sex scenes are pretty funny…since they’re just f* buddies, there’s no romance and the sex is pretty nonchalant. They don’t do all the crazy positions like in No Strings Attached but it’s what they talk about during sex that’s really funny: “How was work today?” “Had a sandwich” “Oh, nice”. Woody Harrelson plays a flamboyantly gay sports editor at GQ and each of his lines are laugh at loud without a doubt. Richard Jenkins plays Justin’s dad who has Alzheimer’s and adds the serious element to the movie (like Anne Hathaway’s Parkinson’s in Love and Other Drugs – yet another recent movie about casual sex). Jenna Elfman plays JT’s sister Annie whose magical son is Nolan Gould who you may know from Modern Family. Masi Oka (Hiro from Heroes) is in here for quick minute as well as Shaun White who plays his douche self.
Friends With Benefits

Woody Harrelson steals the show and Richard Jenkins goes for a ride in Friends With Benefits


The movie feels like it was supposed to be released at least a year ago but was delayed or pushed back. There’s a running joke where Dylan keeps mentioning how planes pretty much fly themselves and that Captain Sully didn’t really do anything…that plane crash was over 2 years ago! The relevant jokes just aren’t relevant anymore. On top of that, they featured flash mobs…flash mobs! That was soo yesterday…when you make a movie targeted to the YouTube generation, you have to be up to the time and Friends With Benefits outdates itself. I wouldn’t recommend seeing it in a theater but it’s a fun rental. The one line I liked from this romcom (there’s always at least one) came from the gay Woody, “It’s not who you spend Friday night with, it’s who you want to spend all of Saturday morning with.” Like most of the cliche’s in this movie, that line is from other movies too but it’s still a good one. The basic lesson of FWB is to just get over yourself and your emotional baggage and stop sabotaging yourself from being happy or letting those around you be happy. Ahh-chooo! ;)


There is something at the end of the credits but it’s not worth staying for. Seriously, don’t wait for it.


It looks like they’re amping up to do A LOT of advance screenings of Friends With Benefits and you can find out how to get passes here!

REVIEW: The Social Network

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

The Social NetworkFacebook. Everyone knows about it and almost everybody is on it. To not be a part of it is just as conscious a decision as not to drink water, as it has become just as much a part of society as eating and sleeping. Despite its widespread popularity, however, for most, little is known about its origins, its founders, and how it has become such an institution in our everyday life. Cue Columbia Pictures to bring you The Social Network, the tale of how this social networking phenom implanted itself into the homes of millions of Americans nationwide.


The Social Network’s narrative plays itself out with one main linear story, comprised of flashbacks from two different trial proceedings. The story starts with Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg [Jesse Eisenberg] having a drink and conversation at a small collegiate bar. During a talk about his desire to stand out amongst others in the Harvard community, he belittles various social / educational groups and ultimately, the female friend with whom he is conversing. For his pomposity, she dumps him, and despite his plead for forgiveness, leaves him alone at the bar. Unable to cope with his situation, he gets drunk and blogs about the incident, eventually creating a website to desecrate the entire female population of his school. The site catches the attention of a group of well off, high society students, who entrust him to help them build HarvardConnect, an exclusive online social network that collectively links the students of Harvard to one another. It is the instillation of this idea in Zuckerberg’s head that gets the gears turning towards the invention of The Facebook.

The Social Network

Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg building Facebook


It is here that he starts on what one could argue is a paradoxical ascending downward spiral. With the capital fronted to him by his best friend / business manager Eduardo Saverin [Andew Garfield] & the programming help of his roommate Dustin Moskovitz [Joseph Mazzello], he gets to work on this business venture that sends him on a roller coaster of events including run-ins with fellow students, beautiful co-eds, lawyers, investors, and the highly influential friend / foe Sean Parker [Justin Timberlake.] It’s a journey that is just as enjoyable to watch as it seems would have been to have experienced it first hand.
The Social Network

Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) and Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake) talking over drinks


Where The Social Network succeeds is that it is able to bring to the screen a story that is not only entertaining and informative, but also believable. Too many times, Hollywood takes the story of real life events and twists it to the point that the audience no longer believes that what they are seeing is possible. The Social Network, on the other hand, delivers a story that anybody that has ever attended a college can relate to. Getting drunk at parties, hanging out with your friends in the dorm, and dealing with relationships, it’s all there. Only it tells the story in the context of the creation of Facebook, and given that it’s something that everyone who has ever updated their status wants to know, it makes it all the more stimulating.


In addition to the story itself, a commendation should go to the acting. Somehow director David Fincher was able to extract a superb performance from his entire cast. Ranging from Eisenberg’s portrayal of the pretentious & business minded yet somewhat socially awkward Mark Zuckerberg to Timberlake’s sleazy yet lovable Sean Parker, it seems as though the actors captured all the intricacies of the characters. Even the smaller supporting roles shone through and conveyed the moments of tumultuous emotion with a polish that lent to the overall effectiveness of the film. Everybody on screen seemed to really nail what they were trying to achieve with their roles.
The Social Network

Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) and his roommate Dustin Moskovitz (Joseph Mazzello)


All told, The Social Network a great film. It details the very sequence of events that led to Facebook’s creation and the obstacles that had to be surpassed for it to be as successful as it is today. Above and beyond, however, is that it does this in a manner that seemingly would be enjoyable to the Facebook using demographic. It manages to stay within all the boundaries of being a believable, enjoyable ride that informs while entertaining. I’d definitely suggest this movie to anybody who has ever used (or avoided) the social networking conglomerate known to us all as Facebook.



We will be posting more advance screenings of The Social Network, so keep checking!